" /> Learn From It: December 2005 Archives

« November 2005 | Main | January 2006 »

December 29, 2005

A Quarter-Century Requital

Christmas isn't about Christ. Christmas was a pagan ritual stolen by the Romans and turned into Saturnalia. And that was a feast where men gave presents to other men (because women weren't real people in the eyes of Rome) and ate a lot and had sex with each other.

In fact, Protestants (perhaps the Methodists) banned celebrations of Christmas. Probably because the Pilgrims figured that Jesus will hate you if you hold a pagan ritual on his birthday.

So one thing lingers as personally important to me, and that is the family Christmas Eve dinner at my parents' house. Even more specifically, my Dad's turn at public speaking (well, at least in front of the family) when he says his own homespun Grace.

IsightMy personal contribution was the idea that I could “be there” by putting together the technology they, for the most part, had around them. My brother Sam has a new iBook. Marie and Jack have an iSight camera and a broadband connection. I had Brother Sam go out and pick up an Airport ExpressIndexhand06072004 to complete the project. So: Mac OS X Tiger + iChat + iSight + iBook + Airport Express = Family Teletogetherness®! Sam sat his iBook on the Dinner table at the far end of the table from my Dad's seat, set my own video feed (I have an iSight camera, too) to the full screen of the iBook and aimed the camera at Dad. So at 15 fps, there was my father, saying grace right in front of me. I dare say it was one of the better ideas I've ever had.

During the prayer, my father mentioned my mother's long joke about paternity—a recap: first it was “you know, kids, you always know who your mother is but you can never be sure who your father is” and later more precipitously to my father, “ok, ok, two out of the three of them are yours, but I'm not saying which two”.

This latter comment has gone on for some time; it's one of our funniest traditions. Dad will call me up and leave voicemail “This is your father-I-think”, and my mother will sign all birthday cards “Love, Mom and Dad(??)”. So my dad, in his grace over the Christmas Eve Dinner, says, “I don't care if I'm the father or not: they're all my kids. He then pauses, as he does in order to refocus on his notes, and adds, ”All ten of them!“

I was laughing my ass off, forgetting that they could all see and hear me just as I could see and hear them.

After 25+ years of Mom owning the tactical advantage on the running paternity joke, my father, in one fell swoop, steals it back.

And that, dear readers, is a sublime example of the True Meaning of Christmas: family. Family is what you make it. DNA is only part of the story.

Technorati Tags


December 27, 2005

I'm Bifocal!

So I knew this was coming. I knew it because it's something that happens to both gay and straight people, typically when they hit their 40s.

Oh, you might think the cause would be fatigue or too much experience, but no. It's simply a function of age.

Get your minds out of the gutter (no wait, don't). Presbyopia is the culprit, chil'ren. I realized it about three weeks ago, when I'd get headaches—and if you've seen the size of my head, you'd know that's somethin'.

So as a temporary fix, I decided to get some $9.99 reading glasses at Walgreens. I called up Marie and asked her how I'd figure out the ones that were right for me. I ended up with +150s with no real confidence that I did the right thing: I only got the +150s because all the +125s were ugly.

Then, being out of practice with glasses, I lost 'em. So on Christmas Eve, I'm at the Walgreens trying on other lens strengths. I settled on the +200s: in for a penny, in for a pound, right?

Well, today I went to see the Eye Goddess, also known as Kathleen Kennedy to do the right thing.

So I'm going to wear glasses again. At least when I read—so far, so good with using my Mac(s). So the glasses have progressive lenses. That means bifocals, essentially, with a smooth transition between the reading part and the regular part. There is no prescription, per se, for the regular part, save to correct for very mild astigmatism, and the reading-glasses part is only +125.

But....bifocals.

Sssssrrriussssssly.


Technorati Tags


December 26, 2005

Need a Little NYE

Could this year please be over NOW?

I'm not looking forward to ringing in the new year, officially, with many of the very same others who caused 2005 to suck so much, so often. So much am I dreading it that I'm giving very serious consideration to being apart from my partner because of it. And so I just thought if tonight were NYE, then logistics would decide for me.

It would be so easy, in moments like these, to extinguish the light of decency and fairness and optimism and hope inside me and just turn Republican.

I wonder if this is how it usually happens.

Technorati Tags

December 24, 2005

All about [Christmas] Eve Eve

Nothing is what it seems; nothing is what you expect. Nothing is nothing-at-all.

Indexfrontside20051011This is the life you choose when you choose, the one you lead when you lead. And in an acute sense, sometimes the way to lead your own life is to let Pan lead you along his path. I know, it makes no sense in the telling of it. But that's alright. Life, dear friends, is in the living.

On Friday—yesterday—I went down to work, knowing Pan it would be desolate, that I'd likely be the only one there. I was there because, well, I'm not sure why because I could have easily telecommuted. Ahh, but I did need to pick up some things at the Company Store down on Apple Campus, and so I did that. So I hopped on a Caltrain Baby Bullet, where Santa handed me a candy cane and wished me a Merry Christmas. I smiled for longer than expected. But down to Cupertino I went. Which led me to the rest of my day, living in the vault of the sky, our City, a welkin on earth.

I had set to buy a few small items that Sam wanted, and ended up participating in Christmas more than I'd expected: I found something for one of the best guys in the world, my Fred The Plumber, and something for David B., the manager of the place where I played Santa—twice!—this year (pics to follow ASAP).

Daddys440-1Our manager sent us all home early, and off I went, having to take a $20 cab ride from Apple to the Caltrain station. I got back to the City mid-afternoon, expecting to just chill for a while. Not to be. I had to drop off a package at a friend's and decided to stay out and drop off David B.'s gifts as well.

I knew he was working, so I stopped in at Daddy's 440. On the way over, rain threatening, I thought of my Aunt, the one I've mentioned here many times. Her favorite cocktail was a Manhattan, and whenever the mood strikes—which ends up being about once a year—I have one in her honor. And to honor my own memories, I always get an extra cherry in mine: Tootsie (her nickname) would let me have the cherry from her drinks. I was quite a little boy, and my mom never knew, but it was something special for me. Just enough taste of bourbon and sweet vermouth to convince me that adults drank potent drinks and I'd never do that and I'd never become one.

Well, one out of two ain't bad.

I asked David for one, and he brightened. “I make the best Manhattans in the world. Did you know that?” “Nope, I didn't. Oh, and can I have an extra cherry?” He smiled. And you have to understand that when David smiles at you, the world goes away. It's like that.

Well, one Manhattan turned into three: he does make the best Manhattans in the world—Toots would have approved.

David's partner, John, stopped by and I chatted with him for well over two hours. Carol Merrill, Grease 2 and any number of other topics were covered. John and I hadn't ever had much of a chance to talk, but this certainly made up for it.

A man with an East Texas accent from the Avenues interrupted us, and rubbed the hair on my forearm, swooning. I was embarrassed. John is a diplomat. The man said that it was obvious that two such handsome men were a couple and I had to point out that no, in fact, John belonged to David and vice versa, but assured him that I had my own handsome man at home. The man bought a round of shots. “Easy stuff,” David said, handing us little glasses full of Peach Schnapps.

Having a “long drive” home to the Avenues, the man excused himself and set down his still-two-thirds-full drink and walked out. Just as John and I recovered from the whirlwind of the man, he popped back in and handed me a small wrapped gift: for you, he says, and is gone again.

I'd just finished China Boy by Gus Lee on the trainride home, and ever since the first couple of chapters when he related Chinese culture to food, I'd been craving it. So after I left Daddy's 440 Castro and made a quick stop at the video rental place (none of your business), I ran across the street to get some food: BBQ Pork chow fun and chicken chow mein. Two pints packed with food for $5.20. Not bad. I dropped $1 into the tip jar, then fished out another from the wad of bills she'd handed me back and dropped that into the tip jar as well. “Enough! Enough! Too much! Too much!” she blurted, smiling. I just smiled back, warmly. “It's fine, it's fine,” I said through the lingering smile. “Happy Holidays!” she said, voice chasing after me as I walked out. The broken English of an “anti-Christmas” saying made me feel more in the soi disant “Christmas spirit” more than any other moment.

I zipped home in a misting rain on the Vespa, happy to find that I had not only soy sauce in the cupboard, but also chopsticks in a drawer, two things I'd forgotten with the take-out.

I. Ate. It. ALL. OMG.

I scarfed it down while watching the best/worst TV show of all time, Passions, the NBC Soap. Poisoned guacamole (!!!) led to an accident which led to the handsomest man in daytime to be laid up Schiavo-style in bed for weeks with his shirt off. In classic (that is to say, dumb-ass) soap style, he miraculously shows up at Christmas Mass (with a shirt on, dammit all) and claims a real “Christmas Miracle”. If it weren't so campy, it'd be offensive (though I imagine that most people wouldn't be offended if only it weren't so campy).

It was also a few days worth of multiple references, including JM J Bullock, Glynnis Johns and, today, more Glynnis Johns and Bill Pullman. Julie Andrews, Camelot, Cabaret and Mame.

Tonight I'm watching Auntie Mame, one of the many DVDs that have Christmas references. It seems the least I could do for having such a non-Christmassy Christmas so far.


Technorati Tags










December 22, 2005

Rectum Santorum

The sheer blatancy of Rick Santorum's recent disassociation with the Thomas More Law Center, a “Christian-rights” organization, speaks volumes about the hubris of the American Right Wing. They've always been in a state of denial about the world, but until recently, they've fooled enough people that they could get away with it: there were things that no one would call them on, a space where no foes would enter: the Conservative Sanctum Sanctorum.

SabirthOn the surface, Rick Santorum's move is inexplicably stupid. He gives every appearance of being a fair weather friend, of changing his mind because he backed the losing whores horse.

What he actually is doing is attempting to set up further support for so-called “Intelligent Design” by distancing himself and ID from the “religious argument”: Santorum told the Philadelphia Inquirer that he was troubled by testimony indicating religion motivated some board members to adopt the policy.

Religion and ID overlapping?!? Why, The Honorable Mr. Santorum seems to be surprised by the notion that they're not separate things! What a fellow.

Apparently Santorum will hook up with just anyone without checking out their background. He had an association with the Thomas More Law Center, whose website contains their mission statement, quite easily discoverable. An excerpt:

The Thomas More Law Center affirms the right of Christians to publicly practice their religion and freely express their religious beliefs. Our Founding Fathers fought for a nation built on a foundation of religion and morality. Our lawyers are committed to restoring and preserving that foundation.

These are the folks who were defending the Dover schoolboard's decision to require teaching of ID in science classrooms. So you can see how Santorum would be surprised to find out that people choose ID over evolution for religious reasons.

Personally, I think ID should be mentioned in Science classrooms in its due proportion of scientific merit. If I were a science teacher, I would mention the existence of groups of people who believe origins to be based on Intelligent Design and then offer a summary of their position: God Did It.

And then I'd spend the rest of the school year providing examples and theories and research all supporting evolution.

ID isn't Science. It isn't even anti-Science. It's ridiculous posturing and lying by Christians who should be following their own Commandments.


Technorati Tags





December 21, 2005

The Science of Science

So. Intelligent Design. I wonder if its proponents are starting to wish that their grand plan to redefine science wasn't also the work of at least one Intelligent Designer.

There's an irony to the pomposity and pride that accompanied the Christian/Fundamentalist push to corrupt Science in order to serve themselves. Last time I checked, Humility was a big deal with the Christians. That's not ironic, tho, that's just hypocritical. What's ironic is that Humility has a profound role in the scientific approach to discovery, and that it was Science's absence of ego that thwarted the Christian attempt at corrupting it.

I'm not saying that every scientist is humble; far from it. What this is about, in fact, is that there is no hubris behind something arrived at by proper scientific method. Assertions generally require believability; and believing generally requires a strong persona (human or mythic) in which the masses can have faith. Science uses assertions, of course, but only tentatively or temporarily, meaning that there's a willingness to drop an assertion when it's demostrated to be untrue or impossible, or to drop an assertion when the truth of it changes.

Christian “truth” mongers abound, hiking up and down Main Street America with their big sacs of capital-T's, asserting various truths to be Truths, immediately ossifying each into Timelessness (see? those capital-T's come in handy!). Trouble is, many truths don't become Timeless Truths, they just become Dated.

I can assert here that this is a plausible mechanism by which every myth moves into History: it becomes incompatible with the Present because it refuses to adapt to the times.

The Discovery Institute—which seems hell bent on doing everything to prevent actual discovery of anything, calls the recent Dover ruling a “triumph”, stating: “Anyone who thinks a court ruling is going to kill off interest in intelligent design is living in another world...”

Remember, folks, these are the same types of people who brought you the Scopes Monkey Trial, who saw fit to find John Scopes “guilty” of teaching evolution. Again. Not irony. Hypocrisy.

KitzmillerpdfFact of the matter is, the rest of us are living in another world, the world of material explanations which humbly acknowledge the limits and limitations of learning and set to painstakingly carve out those niches of knowledge that are discoverable. We don't live in the world they live in, where Zeus came down from Olympia to create the world, the world where interpretation of the Christian bible contemporarily paints Jesus of Nazareth as a neocon.

These are the people who deny the mutability of truth even as they seek to change it.

Click on the document icon to download the full PDF of the Dover judge's summary of Monkey Trial II. Below is an excerpt that I find extraordinary for its directness:

Those who disagree with our holding will likely mark it as the product of an activist judge. If so, they will have erred as this is manifestly not an activist Court. Rather, this case came to us as the result of the activism of an ill-informed faction on a school board, aided by a national public interest law firm eager to find a constitutional test case on ID, who in combination drove the Board to adopt an imprudent and ultimately unconstitutional policy. The breathtaking inanity of the Board's decision is evident when considered against the factual backdrop which has now been fully revealed through this trial. The students, parents, and teachers of the Dover Area School District deserved better than to be dragged into this legal maelstrom, with its resulting utter waste of monetary and personal resources.


Technorati Tags



December 19, 2005

Sparkling Conversationalism

Now, you all know or at least know of the dogpoet by now. He, of eloquence; I, of loquaciousness. He, sublime; I, subli[vote for godofbiscuits]minal. He, gorgeous; I, gorrrrly; Ithaca, gorges.

Anyhoo. I fully blame myself (even though he started it) for bringing our iChat conversations down to this level:

Piggy-V-Dogpoet

Columbia, Carnegie Mellon, New York, San Francisco. Oink. Woof.

Meow.


Technorati Tags


December 18, 2005

Frosty the Snowman

In my neo-anti-TiVo world of Comcast HD and its not-yet-TiVo DVR, I find myself channel-surfing instead of choosing programs from the Now Showing MyDVR listing. Happening upon a show you might want to watch has its merits. Same class of things as getting inspiration from looking at a bunch of random images or new ideas from looking at non-related books stacked or tucked in side-by-side on a bookshelf.

So I ended up at the start of Frosty the Snowman.

This, naturally, tripped a stream of consciousness that flowed, ebbed and splashed through memories: Frosty was always shown on CBS. Channel 22, WYOU was out of Scranton, PA and so the reception was almost non-existent, making Frosty one of the least-watched Christmas Specials for us. Ghosting of images was the best we could manage. Then, in my head, ghosted images went to remembering analog scrambling of the premium channels on cable TV. In turning the “fine tune” outer-ring on the channel selector, one could hear the movie on HBO, or see the picture on HBO in black-and-white. But not both. So enterprising protonerd that I was, I would “watch” Grease on the little black-and-white TV in the bedroom and “listen” to it by blaring the TV from the family room. The rooms weren't too far apart for the delay in audio-syncing to be unbearable. Ahh, the things you do when your folks won't pony up the money because HBO also showed R-rated movies.

I digress.

The picture tonight, was in HD, with every frame, every line, every space a perfect solid color. No ghosts. Just snowmen and bad dialog. Bad dialog in processed 5.1 Dolby Digital. With my iBook in front of me, I went hunting for the name behind the voice of Frosty. Good ol' IMDB. Found out the guy's name, Jackie Vernon, and what else he was in and when I looked up, the opening credits were playing and the man's name was there. I don't know why, but that made me laugh: I could have just waited, but it didn't occur to me to wait. Strange all the differences in how we approach such a thing. In the 70s, Frosty the Snowman was a Christmas Special! A Television Event! Today, it's just video content with lots of metadata wrapped around it and easy accessibility either through DVR, DVD or happenstance.

There's a more discerning eye these days, a function of being 41 and, I suppose, just plain better at observation. Or perhaps it's just that adult observations are more complete, more nuanced, more particular than a teenager's or child's. In any case, I noticed a rather existential, post-modernist view to Frosty's waking moments. Here's the dialog:


FROSTY
Happy Birthday! Hey, I said my first words! But snowmen can't talk! CHUCKLES. Alright, c'mon now...what's the joke? Could...could I really be alive? I mean, I can make words. I can move. I can juggle. I can sweep. I can count to ten....1...2...3...4...5....9...6...8....well, I can count to five! LAUGHS. Whaddya know! I'm even ticklish. In fact, I'm all livin'! I am alive! What a neat thing to happen to a nice guy like me!

Clearly the Christmas Snow (Three's Company anyone?) from which Frosty was constructed is not subject to the Bootstrapping Problem.

I also noticed that before Frosty starts counting, he has the standard-cartoon-issue 3-fingers-plus-thumb on each hand, but when he presents his counting (right) hand there's an extra finger! And his left hand still has only four digits! It's creepy, but it only lasts a moment: when he drops his counting hand, it reverts to four digits. That whacky-magical Christmas Snow, I tell ya.

Of course, IMDB told me later of this and two other “goofs” in the show, but I'd call the presti-extra-digitation something other than a goof. Like Frosty himself, Frosty was given the finger because it was necessary. All kids need a little magic in their lives. And all of us, in one way or another, are still kids.

<segue>Insert here</segue>

Oh, and Santa also blackmails someone in this show.


Technorati Tags



December 16, 2005

Taking the Cure

Last night while Sam was DJing at the White Horse he sent these three text messages to my phone:

However far away, I will always love you | 05/12/15 23:02

However long I stay, I will always love you | 05/12/15 23:04

Whatever words I say, I will always love you | 05/12/15 23:04

I was asleep already when he sent them, so I read them just this morning and commented to him:


JEFF
Thank you for the text messages last night. That was sweet.

SAM
So what are you going to do for me?

JEFF
Let you live.

Now that's love, baby.

Technorati Tags


December 13, 2005

Best Gay Blog Vote

Go here. Apparently, God of Biscuits is one of their “Popular Gay Blogs”. Go vote for me! And while you're at it, vote for Mikey, the DogPoet for “Best Reviewed Gay Blog”.

Technorati Tags

I Want To Vanish—Sometimes

Sometimes, apropos of nothing—or at least of nothing tangible or identifiable—escape is the thought that pops into my head. And it's not so much the need for flight, but the need for solitude. Sam can attest to this; all my family can. Sometimes I want the world to just leave me the fuck alone (hold your protests of irony that I speak of this in a blog).

I was thinking of this today, and in that wonderful serendipity that exists only in the Bay Area, this Elvis Costello song comes up on iTunes:

I Want To Vanish

I want to vanish
This is my fondest wish
To go where I cannot be captured
Laid on a decorated dish
Even in splendor this curious fate
Is more than I care to surrender
Now it's too late

Whether in wonder or indecent haste
You arrange the mirrors and the spools
To snare the rare and precious jewels
That were only made of paste

If you should stumble upon my last remark
I'm crying in the wilderness
I'm trying my best to make it dark
How can I tell you I'm rarer than most
I'm certain as a lost dog
Pondering a sign post

Chorus

I want to vanish
This is my last request
I've given you the awful truth
Now give me my rest

For all the “awful truths” I have given in this last year, for all the requests, sometimes I feel like I'm still “crying in the wilderness”.

And yes, I think I'm “rarer than most”, but we each and all possess something that makes us rarer than most in some regard. Those lacking in some kind of something I tend not to be around.

Is vanishing the same thing as escape, even if it's not me that makes the effort to do anything but wish and want?


Technorati Tags


December 12, 2005

Why Marie Rules, #4364

I was lamenting to my Mom the other day in IMs...


JEFF
Who's the patron saint of protecting people from drama queens? I'd really like to have a word with that one.

MARIE
Chloe

JEFF
You're making that up! “St. Chloe”?? LOL

MARIE
nope
St. Chloe of Amsterdam...was an aspiring actress

JEFF
LOL

MARIE
...and a lesbian...understands the gays

JEFF
That's SOOOO funny! very good!

MARIE
...and why they do drag.

JEFF
You're very clever

MARIE
I always have fun IMing with you

Technorati Tags

December 11, 2005

“Christmas” Tree

In my 41+ years, the holidays have meant various things. When I was a child, Christmas was, of course, about presents, about Santa and about going to church to commemorate/celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ. Christmas wasn't ever really the day Jesus was born, not that I remember; it was just the day we all agreed upon as the day to celebrate or remember the fact of his birth. It was a chance to think about external things to look forward to rather than think about the internal world that I always knew was different to anyone else's.

When I was a bit older—we're still in the pre-teen Biscuit era—my burgeoning fabulousness (and whatever happened to that?) had me saving my Christmas money to go shopping one year, obtaining for myself a 4½ ft artificial tree and an assortment of ornaments: Marie always went with a monochromatic theme on the tree (she was ahead of her time) and I wanted a more “traditional” fake tree. You know, one with strings of tiny multi-colored lights and a round treetop which, also multi-colored, used fiber optic strands to great effect. Tradition also had me adding to the ornaments over time, and eventually replacing the fiber optic treetop with a heat-powered one that rotated and cast disco-like lights all over a dimly lit room. “Tradition” included glass ornaments with fake snow painted on them; icicles made of reflective mylar; bubble-lights and garland that looked like a boa on a Christmas Diva from a Christmas Pageant.

I helped with the decorations. I helped with the cookies (though I had always done that, even since I was very small, helping my great-grandmother). I set up the Nativity scene, a group of figurines cast in clay and handpainted and sold by a neighbor of my grandmother. Quite a little business she had going. I even grouped the white electric lights in such a way that a light-burst shone on the Baby Jesus, although I recall struggling with whether the effect was too-Easter for a “traditional” Christmas display.

Teen years had me trying to talk my parents into getting a live tree instead of the “fake” one.

All through this, I should point out, there was yet another Christmas Constant: our Uncle Bill, who always showed up with the most amazing gifts for each of us. He's not really our uncle, and he's gay (had I known this much earlier in my life, the knowledge would have been the best gift of all) and not the real Santa, but awaiting his arrival was always one of our best traditions, not because of the gifts but because he always commanded a room and had everyone laughing and feeling firmly ensconced in Family.

Another of our traditions is a meatless Christmas Eve. Well, meatless until you went to Christmas Mass. This one comes from my mom's forebears, a Polish tradition. Such starchy and seafoody fare was poverty food at one time; today the palette is a bit different, as are the economics, so seafood includes not only sole, but also scallops. The thin mushroom soup is still made by hand by Mom, still from locally harvested mushrooms (though obviously not the same kind of mushrooms they harvested in Poland) and french-fries are still, technically, potatoes. Oh, and pierogies. My grandmother and great-grandmother always made them, but they're labor-intensive and these days they can be bought from Greek Orthodox Churches with the proceeds going to the Church or to Greek-Orthodox-compatible charities. This is the traditional Christmas Eve family dinner for me. Or was until about twenty or twenty-five years ago, when my father, a self-confessed man of non-letters decided it was the right time and mood and situation for him to write his own prayer of grace over the meal. And this has become the finest of our Christmas traditions; whenever I am not there (as will be the case this year), I call them on the phone and listen in. Perhaps this year the tradition will include live video over iChat and Airport and Mom's broadband connection.

In the early days of the Holiday Season “stealing” the Christmas Season (though, I swear that all of my life—Lo! These 41+ years!—I have seen “Seasons Greetings” and “Happy Holidays” appearing in all sorts of places). I always thought that there was a multitude of ways to greet someone at this time of year, and, in greeting a stranger with a smile and the spirit of the season, it was best not to assume anything. Not that I knew about Hanukkah, but I did know that the Protestants were a wily bunch and that there were subtle differences between them and us “real” Christians (e.g., “what was all that 'And Thine is the Power....' bullshit?”). Good times.

These days, I'm on the other side of the “Seasons Greetings” and “Happy Holidays” kerfuffle. I am not a Christian nor a Catholic (though the Catholics will tell you “once a Catholic, always a Catholic”, I think their global assumptions have a tradition of being inaccurate), but you know what? I like the Holiday Season. I like the little twinkling white lights everywhere.

Here there is no snow, nor will there be. But snow is tradition and technology has created a pleasing homage to snow and icicles in the form of these white lights and other decorations.

At this time of the year there is more good will and more joy. Not because of the Baby Jesus, necessarily, but probably fueled more by the tradition of pausing and holding one's breath as the odometer turns over to the next big chunk of time. We're closing out yet another year where we're still here, and why not get the world all tarted up to celebrate the fact?

Christians aren't happy about the world opening its kimono, though, to allow everyone to join in and be convivial. Not happy with welcoming without malice or expectation those who believe or behave different to their own Tradition.

In fact, we Liberals are accused of being at it again. We're “stealing Christmas”, says the “Reverend” Jerry Falwell.

I, of course, have a tradition of thinking that Jerry Falwell is neither reverend nor terribly “Christian” in his deportment. He's quite the Soldier of the Lord, but somehow, I think soldiering is better rendered unto the world's Caesar than to Jesus. Just guessing.

I, for one, would like to thank anyone and everyone who chooses inclusion over an apposite display of piety, who acts like a Christian instead of just sounding like one.

But most of all, I'd like those who think people are stealing Christmas from them to remember that they, in fact, stole the notion of the Christmas tree from someone else and incorporated it into their own mythology.

Now, maybe I'm just full of shit in this, but I just want you to consider the Christians holding so dear that symbol which they consider a fair and true representation of the birth of a person they believe willingly came to this world, born of a virgin, who would eventually be crucified, died and buried, and who, according to myth, did it for all of us. So! Without further ado, I give you the symbol of the Celebration of the Birth of the Lord Jesus Christ that the Christians of this age so need to protect:


Xmastrees

Someone has to protect the original meaning of Christmas, right? But I tell you what: while you're doing that, I'm going to enjoy the lights, and the feeling. And being spared from preaching. And the inclusion many Christians give the rest of us. And including the Christians in whatever they choose to participate in with the rest of us. And the concept of “show me, don't tell me”. And the promise of a new year. And the green of our Winter.

And my father's prayer over us all.

Technorati Tags






December 05, 2005

Poesy in “Heresy”

The Constitutional Court of South Africa has uncovered the Horrors of the Gay Agenda™ and applied them to the South African state:

A democratic, universalistic, caring and aspirationally egalitarian society embraces everyone and accepts people for who they are. To penalise people for being who and what they are is profoundly disrespectful of the human personality and violatory of equality. Equality means equal concern and respect across difference. It does not presuppose the elimination or suppression of difference. Respect for human rights requires the affirmation of self, not the denial of self. Equality therefore does not imply a levelling or homogenisation of behaviour or extolling one form as supreme, and another as inferior, but an acknowledgement and acceptance of difference. At the very least, it affirms that difference should not be the basis for exclusion, marginalisation and stigma. At best, it celebrates the vitality that difference brings to any society. The issue goes well beyond assumptions of heterosexual exclusivity, a source of contention in the present case. The acknowledgement and acceptance of difference is particularly important in our country where for centuries group membership based on supposed biological characteristics such as skin colour has been the express basis of advantage and disadvantage. South Africans come in all shapes and sizes. The development of an active rather than a purely formal sense of enjoying a common citizenship depends on recognising and accepting people with all their differences, as they are. The Constitution thus acknowledges the variability of human beings (genetic and socio-cultural), affirms the right to be different, and celebrates the diversity of the nation. Accordingly, what is at stake is not simply a question of removing an injustice experienced by a particular section of the community. At issue is a need to affirm the very character of our society as one based on tolerance and mutual respect. The test of tolerance is not how one finds space for people with whom, and practices with which, one feels comfortable, but how one accommodates the expression of what is discomfiting.

Those bastards! How dare they subvert the Will of God[-followers]?

They have no shame. The document also states:

The exclusion of same-sex couples from the benefits and responsibilities of marriage, accordingly, is not a small and tangential inconvenience resulting from a few surviving relics of societal prejudice destined to evaporate like the morning dew. It represents a harsh if oblique statement by the law that same-sex couples are outsiders, and that their need for affirmation and protection of their intimate relations as human beings is somehow less than that of heterosexual couples. It reinforces the wounding notion that they are to be treated as biological oddities, as failed or lapsed human beings who do not fit into normal society, and, as such, do not qualify for the full moral concern and respect that our Constitution seeks to secure for everyone. It signifies that their capacity for love, commitment and accepting responsibility is by definition less worthy of regard than that of heterosexual couples.

Wow...they've come a long way from the Apartheid State of just fifteen years ago.

I keep thinking about this “activist judges” concept. Considering that the courts don't get to write new laws, only knock down those which conflict with the abstract ideals of our country as laid down in the Constitution, I don't see the opportunity to be an activist of any stripe. In fact, the Judiciary, at least in the upper echelons, is the closest thing to idealism as any government gets.

By the way, the Constitutional Court of South Africa did not vote unanimously to legalize same-sex marriage and order the rest of the government to make it happen within twelve months. There was one dissenter: she wanted the government to make them happen immediately.

Technorati Tags


December 04, 2005

Knew Year's Resolutions

It occurs to me that as we approach the end of another year, news “features” will talk about New Years' Resolutions...person-on-the-street kind of stuff. Cloyingly stupid things that make all people seem shallow and, worse, all look the same.

Folks will diet and they'll join gyms and they'll promise to be nicer. But everyone wants to diet after the gorging of the holidays and it's Wintertime and it's awfully cold out and that sofa is awfully comfy—and hey, isn't the Holiday Season the Most Wonderful Time of the Year™ so didn't we just spend all of our own individual Niceness®?

Though I am not a fan of words themselves, I'm a big fan of using the right word—no matter how large or how little known—and right now, the word resolution is the one that I'm turning over and over in my head.

res•o•lu•tion |ˌrezəˈloō sh ən|
noun
1 a firm decision to do or not to do something : she kept her resolution not to see Anne any more | a New Year's resolution.
2 the action of solving a problem, dispute, or contentious matter : the peaceful resolution of all disputes | a successful resolution to the problem.
[...]
ORIGIN late Middle English: from Latin resolutio(n-), from resolvere ‘loosen, release’ (see resolve ).

The typical, tired “New Year's Resolutions” obviously fit into the first definition of the word. But what about the second definition?

We look to the New Year, to January 1st as a rebirth—we even have a Baby New Year. It's when we get to reset ourselves to the first day of the first month. A chance for a new beginning. And isn't that handy?

It's nice that we hand ourselves a fresh start. Truly. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for renewal and reinvention, remaking and restarting: I've certainly done it myself enough times.

But there's something we lose when we borrow what is essentially a social hack for a shot at too-easy rebirth. Look at the Born-Agains. Look at Jimmy Swaggart and Newt Gingrich. A contract made with a prostitute and a Contract With America made by a prostitute. No one earned the fresh start. We don't earn the fresh start a turnover on the chronometer promises.

What about that second definition above? Who takes the end of the year and makes it about resolving the problems that have happened over the past year? I'm not talking about closure. That's another word and one that lacks the vitality and the active voice needed for true resolution.

We might also think that the negative things that have happened to us are definitive and closed. Done. History. The problem with that is the chimeric nature of the Past: we suppose that it's immutable and we act as if it's immutable, even as the Past reconfigures and remaps itself to a different Reality, a different Truth almost daily.

Those two qualities of the Past form a set of race conditions where the future means less because we know that its permanence can always be changed to suit. Or if not changed, at least forgotten. It also diminishes the ongoing Present, spreading it out into the near Past and near Future until there is no longer the goad to decide because there's no longer a real here and real now.

Well, I'm going to try something different this year. As many of you know, this has not been a very good year for the Biscuit God, over all—and a few of you know exactly why it's been bad and in what ways.

History with the immutable (e.g., death) has taught me that rolling with the punches is the only way to keep on rolling sometimes. Sometimes. That's the key. Sometimes you have to punch back. Not out of bravura or machismo or in a tit-for-tat, but because it's the right thing, where I am defining “right” as that which helps to prevent a recurrence of the same bad stuff and seeks to create a space where good stuff can appear.

There have been bad guys. Some have made restitution or apology, but even that is not enough. Something else has to happen; I have to make something happen, to play the Trickster to my own life.

To that end, the right thing to do? Punishment.

Not revenge, mind you. Revenge is for children or the emotionally retarded (you know who you are). Punishment is education. Punishment is pain, or at least cost, but still it comes with a lesson. Without the lesson, it degenerates into offense or violence or, yes, revenge.

These are not threats, nor even promises. More like....predictions. “You Will Pay” is a prediction.

I intend to resolve those bad things which happened this year insofar as I am able, insofar as they are resolvable. The Known Year...the second definition...the people and the the situations. The Leader must learn he's not a leader at all, Alpha Dogs must grow spines. A Buddy isn't a buddy because a Rose actually never does go by any other name. Chances Aren't. usw...

All of it, all of them, under scrutiny in order to bring my own sunlight to my own well-earned January 1st.

And isn't that better than hitting some cosmic reset button for an annual freebie?


Technorati Tags

December 01, 2005

VirtualRibbon

This year, World AIDS Day is a tough one for me. I usually don't try to suss out why, but the personal reasons this year are obvious, sometimes nearly orthogonal and exceedingly multiple.

Animation5 Hope is a tricky thing. When there's a lot of hopefulness (quantity), it lacks specificity (quality), and when it's quite specific, it is small and personal in its solicitude. I don't like to think that this is simply the nature of Hope itself, but instead some too-obvious pattern of human economy, where one thing always has to take from another, when jealousy or morality steps in to question the value of certain kinds of Hope when those things Wished For cast too long a shadow on other forms.

I have had the extraordinary experience of rediscovering a friend from High School who blessedly and thankfully has ended up with an M.D./Ph.D. and works so industriously and brilliantly to combat the human suffering caused by infectious agents—including HIV. Her work, her person is a powerful and pointed example of why Hope has merit in this world and why pessimism serves nothing but its own unimaginative purpose. Her staggering brilliance and admirable use of it humbles me.

Then there's the synergistic timing of reading a futurist book, including talk of the wonders of the future of medical advances and technological advances—or, more to the point, the flipside of all that: those who didn't quite make it to the next level of available palliatives and curatives. Of course I speak about Allen Howland and what he lost by not being here to experience the wonders of the world and what the world has lost by losing the million things that were alive in that marvelous memory and intellect of his and what the immediate constellation of friends and family have personally missed out on as we all continue to miss him.

This applies to anyone who's lost anyone special to them, naturally, and for the time being, death is something we have no preventatives for—though I think one day that will change, perhaps in time for those of us alive today to exploit. So why specify AIDS as any more or less a cause of death than cancer or accident or murder? Why have a day for it?

To this I answer a question with a question: why must the assumption be made that World AIDS Day detracts or somehow competes at all?

To this I answer a question with solid science laced with Hope:

  • HIV is infectious: awareness and diligence have an effect on slowing or stopping HIV.
  • Scientific knowledge learned here can be applied to a vast array of other maladies: viral mechanics, cellular communications mechanisms, protein synthesis, gene activation and molecular pathways and epidemiology and morality and ethics and social phenomenon all play a part and knowledge about each has increased dramatically, directly, from AIDS-related research.
  • The Past must be preserved: “out of sight, out of mind” applies. And “out of mind” leads to “out of consideration” which leads to behaviors that favor the continued transmission of HIV and other socially- and sexually-transmitted diseases.
  • AIDS affects 40 million people around the world: imagine if all 40 million were Americans: then every seventh person you walked by in a typical day could be assumed to be HIV+.
  • Three million people became HIV+ in 2005 alone, and eight thousand people die from HIV-disease-related causes every day. Five people every second. That means by the time you got to these words in this entry, another 150 to 300 people have died.

And Yet? Hope.

Hope, in spite of a staggering loss worldwide and individually. Hope, in spite of moralists who'd rather see people die than live the “wrong” way. Hope, in spite of missing Allen and Bob and Kelly and George. Hope, in spite of worrying about J. and M. and V. and B. and S. and M. and J. and high percentage of gay male San Franciscans getting sick and leaving us too soon, far, far too soon.

And finally, Hope. Hope that keeping present the staggering loss and the ongoing pain and the simple remembrance of the bad things, the hurtful things, the things we were taught to feel shame over will lead to more and more Hope of a healed future.

Perhaps I feel so downtrodden and debilitated in the present because I feel so full of the future and that takes me away from the Now.

And that's why we—that's why I—need a World AIDS Day: as a reminder that the only chance of making a difference is to be in the Now and DO SOMETHING, even if that's reaffirming that you won't negligently or intentionally become HIV+ or if you already are HIV+, that it ends with you.


Technorati Tags