" /> Learn From It: September 2004 Archives

« August 2004 | Main | October 2004 »

September 29, 2004

Faster, Pussycat

Whether I've mucked around too much with OS X Server, or, having already lost its Firewire ports and the analog side of its video card (DVI/ADC still works), hardware is to blame, the blog server at home has been illin' for the past week.

The G4 Cube is a wonder...8" on a side, built in CD-R and AirPort (that's 802.11b, to you nerds), 100BT ethernet, DVI video, firewire, and NO FAN. It's been a trusty machine for a while now. The ethernet port may be to blame, but the AirPort connections were also very slow. That suggests a software issue. We Live In Hope.

Until the Cube is back up and running—assuming it gets there—this friendly neighborhood blog is being served up to you by Sam's iMac, lovingly known as "Fred".

September 28, 2004

Gall, Up.

Gallup.com runs the headline: Bush Retains Lead, Up by Eight Points. Now, while that's factually correct, I'm assuming (I don't know that for sure, actually, I'm just taking their word), is it true? Let's break it all down into little tiny meaningless bits, just like the hordes of wonder-free, nuance-free, respect-free Republicans do. No, c'mon, it'll be fun!

Let's take the first part. "Bush Retains Lead". So they're saying he's had a lead, and he's keeping it.

Let's take the second part. "Up by Eight Points." This one isn't so clear. He's still up by 8 points? He's up by 8 points more? Both?

Well, it can't be both. Here's where I'm going to apply a little syllogistic reasoning (no clicking that close-box in the upper left corner of your window!). If he's up by eight more points, he can't remain up by eight points because his numbers cannot have changed while remaining the same. If you think it can, I've got some non-Euclidean acreage to sell you. (and yes, nerds, I know that the surface of an oblate spheroid is non-Euclidean, but try finding a real estate agent who will take that into account. And if you do, run!).

But notice that the gallup headline wants it both ways? "Retains" is good news! "Up" is good news! Why not put both in a headline!

Here's where the self-enfeebled Republican's mind may see the wheels falling of the wagon, but here goes: the headline implies a thing, too. History. Trend. Retain is a word that states a relation to the previous. Up is also a word that requires a relative value.

Gallup is trying to tell the skimmers something, indeed! They're casually allowing you to believe that the trends are clearly in Bush's favor. It takes until the third paragraph for them to tell you that Bush's lead, as compared to numbers from less than two weeks ago has dropped to almost half of what it was. Yes, folks, he went from a supposed 13-point lead to an 8-point lead in just under two weeks. (Yes, I'm having fun with numbers, with the almost-half's and the just-under's).

Let's restate them more "concretely": Bush's lead is 62% of what it was 11 days ago. He's lost more than 2/3 of his lead!

This doesn't sound much like a 'retain', does it? But to be fair, Bush is still up, in the numbers. Just not 'up' from last time they measured. In fact, that sounds a lot likes Bush's numbers are down, doesn't it?

So Bush doesn't retain the lead he had 11 days ago AND his numbers are down. You can have both of those. In fact, you must have both.

Read the first paragraph of the article. Then look at the pretty graph. Then read the second paragraph. Then read the third paragraph. The last sentence of the third paragraph: "All of these changes among registered voters are within the poll's margin of error."

That bears repeating: All of these changes among registered voters are within the poll's margin of error.

<EMILY_LITELLA>Oh. Nevermind.</EMILY_LITELLA>

September 27, 2004

Sex, Drugs and....House!

Sam and I went to the Folsom Street Fair yesterday. It was actually an entire day and night full of leather folk. Well, not for Sam and me. We're only leather-ish. And folksy. -Esque, if you will.

I read somewhere that Folsom is the 3rd largest event in California. Not the third largest gay event, but any event. Behind the Rose Bowl Parade (#1), and San Francisco Gay Pride. Must be all the Republicans.

I had a fucking great time. We walked around with friends, each met some people who "knew" us through our blogs. I finally met Stephen from Syracuse, who's incredibly handsome..and built like a brick shithouse. I hope he manages to move to San Francisco. We'd all be lucky to have him here.

We met with other friends, and friends of friends. We met up with Eric and Dave, saw him, saw him (and his boyfriend, Fuad)—still miss him.

We drank a lot and I got sunburned. We were dirty. And dirty with friends. All good clean kinda dirty, though. You know what I'm talkin' 'bout, Mary.

We ended up down at the Lonestar—had to stand in line, the horror!—and then went down to the Real Bad XVI event (hi, Skittles!). Lots and lots of fun. It's my favorite club/dance of the year.

This year, however, was easily the best, because I was with my best Little Man, who presented me with one of the best surprises EVER: Edgar! Of my former next-door neighbors, Bill & Edgar, who I've written about in lavish superlatives here. Sam came over to me while was on the dancefloor and said he had a surprise for me. He stood to the side, and there was Edgar. Oh. My. G--!

Even I had no idea how much it would affect me, seeing Edgar out of the blue. I just kept smilng and screaming and kissing him and then smiling and screaming and kissing Sam and all the world was perfect. Well, except that Bill wasn't there.

We left there near midnight to head home. After we got there, we "got there".

And good times were made. And making it was a good time.

September 25, 2004

Who's Chasing You?

Near the climax of the movie, My Best Friend's Wedding, Rupert Everett's character asks Julia Roberts' character: "He's chasing Kimmy. You're chasing him. Who's chasing you?"

Sometimes I'm afraid to look behind me, expecting the same answer.

September 24, 2004

Sleep Comes Down...NOT

Last night I started getting a sore throat. It was in the midst of settling some last-minute details with the software we deployed yesterday and at first I thought it was just because I was talking a lot on the phone. Then, rather rapidly, quite precipitously, a cold sweat and stuffed nose. Bleah.

So all day today, I experienced what Sam would call "robitripping", or the other-brainly feeling when you've consumed too much dextromethorphan. There's an accelerated feel to your own thoughts, but there's also a sensory distance. The swimming sensation can be distracting, unless you're diligent.

If you're successful in that, the acceleration can be handy. I got a lot of work done today, because my job is almost entirely a mental thing. It's now 5:05 am; I woke up at 1:30 am, unable to fall back asleep. I've watched a couple of TiVo'd episodes of The West Wing, read a few blogs and fixed a significant memory leak in some software I'm working on.

When the sensory distance re-establishes itself, it's like taking a car out of gear, except that you can't also take your foot off the gas. The engine revs and the car becomes something vibrating, yet adrift.

The life I live becomes that life that is being lived as we speak, as I think. I see how different it is from even 18 months ago. I see how big a part of life work has become. That Sam is even in my life at all is a wonder; that he's my boyfriend, my partner, my significant other...well, that's something so profound to me that it's simple a force of nature, a fact of living. The constant feeling of falling flares when I think about him, when I think about us, and I am a giddy thing.

I am reminded, in my detachment, that I am still not back in the habit of being a boyfriend, of living with a partner. I am reminded, in my accelerated brain state, that I am blessed, both here inside my head, and out there, in that life I've got goin' on with that man I've got goin' on.

September 22, 2004

Ofoto Express for Mac Ships!

As many of you know, I'm a long time Mac software developer. Over the course of the last __ years, I've written quite a number of applications. Most of those were for in-house projects or for certain vertical markets, like biotech (I do have a degree in Biological Sciences).

That said, there's now a somewhat high profile app that I had a little sumthin'-sumthin' to do with. I'd like to point you all to Ofoto's website . Click on the "Free Upload Software" link at the lower right of any webpage. If you're on a Mac, follow through and grab a copy of the Mac photo uploader, now called "Ofoto Express for Mac". I've been working on it for almost a year and I'm very proud of it. If you're on a PC, you'll have to be content with looking at the info page. Or go download Ofoto's excellent uploader software if you haven't already.

I'm totally psyched!

September 20, 2004

Wanna Stage a 'Look-In'?

Jimmy Swaggart implies he's more powerful than his god, when he claims he'll murder any 'mo who looks at him longingly [I think I just threw up in my mouth a little bit] and then tell god the guy died. Man, can you imagine what you can do with a cloaking device like that?

The actual quote from the good reverend goes thusly:

I'm trying to find the correct name for it ... this utter absolute, asinine, idiotic stupidity of men marrying men. ... I've never seen a man in my life I wanted to marry. And I'm gonna be blunt and plain; if one ever looks at me like that, I'm gonna kill him and tell God he died."

You can find a more complete story here. You can even go watch the idiot here (scrub to about 36:30). Thanks to Pete for the references.

So I think lots of men—gay and straight, so long as you dislike the Good Reverend Swaggart—should get together and stage a "Look In", where we just go and gaze lovingly [yep, I did throw up in my mouth a little] at that hot hunk o' man and see what he does.

Is it just me, or do more of you expect Swaggart to say that he loves the sinners but hates the sin, and that no one should take any of that personally?

September 17, 2004

The Blind Watchmaker

He posted again, after about a week of not. He's gone that long without posting, longer even, but time seems to bend between New York and San Francisco. Or maybe it's just that life is finally reconfiguring itself into something that sits still long enough to be recognized for such—and this time around, Michael isn't part of the quotidian or even fortnightly mix, causing me some distress.

This time around, there are enough brand new elements that by sheer number and importance they over-illuminate those parts which (thankfully) have remained. Things that have been lost for a little while have returned, but they draw a small enough arc over time to remain effortlessly companionable. For instance, yesterday I managed to leave the office a bit early and Sam and I got our butts to the gym. There I ran into Allen and Mitch, both of whom I hadn't seen in a very long while specifically because I had not been to the gym in a very long while. There, I ran into R., a big army-sergeant of a man who I dated for a few weeks about a thousand years ago. There I ran into a few others who I recognized solely from the gym. Come to think of it, there are a lot of those casual friendships in my life, where Place is relied upon as the guarantor of famliarity.

That's not so much a condemnation of my own laissez-faire approach as it is a simple statement of San Francisco's almost incestuous social reticulum (which, in turn, makes me wonder if the clear crispness limning New York City for me on our visit there was simply taking a break from the "kelp crawl" of our world-class hamlet here).

This time around, we make it out to more parts of San Francisco on a regular basis. This time around, we do things that I've only talked about doing for ages. This time around, I'm happily installed in a house that's not just mine. This time around, there's love like I've never known. This time around, there's far less wishing because there's far more fulfillment.

There are pieces of the life puzzle that no longer build the picture; friends and confidantes and conversation partners who have moved away, or moved on, or walked away. Places I don't get to as much as I used to. Things that must give up their long ensconcements in the home.

I never get it right when it comes to predicting which I'll miss terribly, which I can do without, etc. Typically it is the people, of course, that I miss the most, but not always. Prince wrote in a song, Sometimes It Snows in April that finishes with

All good things they say, never last...
Love isn't love, til it's past.

Ever the optimist, though, I interpret the first line as an opportunity for new good things to come along. Ever the analyst, I posit that the second line admits that history will decide what was valuable and real.

I miss Tucson, to be honest. Or rather, I miss having a not-San-Francisco place that I can go to that is familiar and exotic. Maybe New York City will fill the bill. I don't miss Chicago at all, even though I lived there for a year.

I miss Michael, of course. If you've ever met Michael, there's nothing further I'd have to say. I miss knowing I can just email him and meet him for coffee and conversation that grows a life of its own. There are friends, close and not, who have literally disappeared from me, who I am strangely neutral and dispassionate about.

But each and all of us have our lives that proceed apace—whether or not we're comfortable with that pace—and all these things, thankfully, demand our time only on occasion.

Whether Happy is achieved by thinking, by doing, by loving, by befriending or by sequestration, we all seem to spend more effort in the attempt than in the analysis of failure.

And that's what gives me certainty that there will always be more good things ahead, and that the past is just the past.

September 16, 2004

Trip & Fall

I may be a little slow on the uptake for such things, but the whole Republican thing strikes me as a plain old, ages-old, garden variety power trip. It's a fevered rush for more and more.

More what, you ask? Well, aren't you little Miss Beside-The-Point!

MORE. If they qualified it with concrete units like dollars or acreage, it would just burst the illusion they've convinced themselves of: that they're actually ascetic monks bringing the Right Way of Life to us over-intellectual-yet-unwashed elitists.

Believe it. They talk about sacrifice and they talk about god's favor; the sacrifice comes in the form of obscene cost in materials and human lives. And god's favor? Well, they hate our way of life, and our way is christian, right, Right? Saddam Hussein is a secular power, incompatible with religious ascendancy in every last way. That's why we got rid of him, right, Right?

Treating his own people like second class citizens, over-burdening their lives and for what? For his own selfish needs! President Bush and his flunkies would never do that kind of thing! Only evil people like Saddam.

Sure, he's selfish and secular and thinking only of himself. That's why he was in league with religious extremists—Islam's analog to Christianity's KKK—ready to throw away all he had acquired to serve the needs of his god and his relig—wait a moment, I think I got lost somewhere.

You have to credit President Bush for convincing his followers that somehow a secular elitist could be compatible with religious extremists who are willing to sacrifice everything in the name of their own righteous faith. You have to credit President Bush for all but erasing the plain unvarished fact that bin Laden is a Saudi. You remember the Saudi's, right? Our partners in crime peace?

Follow the acquisitive ones, that's really all you have to do. Who's better off because Saddam is gone? Who's worse off because of spending gone out of control? Who's dead because of it all?

Maybe President Bush will win the election; I mean, anyone who can turn the worst tragedy to befall our country into Happy Camping for himself has to be able to make it appear like he's won an election, right?

Repolling

The "Bush Bounce" done bounced. Another poll is out, putting the two in a dead heat again.

You know what they say: what goes up....is likely to be a shiny distraction for the Republican throngs.

I've already stated how I feel about the lack of value in polling. There's no denying the effect of a poll let loose on an unthinking public, however.

September 15, 2004

Bob on That

A big-ass apology to Unca Bob for missing him yet again. Maybe third time will be the charm? I sure hope so.

September 14, 2004

Grunt...Click...Eep!

The world will go mad on November 3, 2004.

The world will go mad because either way, the current Republican constituency will surrender the remaining dregs of their sanity and give themselves over to either a wailing grief or a hateful finality. Just as there would be no stopping a soi disant conservative George W. President who doesn't have to win another election from running amok over freedom, liberty, truth, decency, good will and humility, to name a few.

It won't be the first time that a regime has convinced its people that they are under threat, that they deserve better than that, that they are better than the rest, that they don't need the rest, that they can guarantee the security of their own people, and that, by might if not by right, they are destined to take what they want in whatever way they want.

Nationalism is a terrible thing; terrible in the sense that a storm can be terrible; terrible in that dictionary definitions #2 & #3 sort of way.

Nationalism flies under the conscious radar and lodges inside somewhere unassailable by rationality, but available to manipulation by threat and by fear.

As I said, it's been done before by others who led their respective nations into ruin.

They say that a good leader is what distinguishes a mob from merely a crowd. And any leader who would create or even attempt to use an unthinking mob in a play for personal ascendancy is, by my own definition, the worst kind of leader.

To think you can control a thing such as that, to think you can even aim such a force of nature for any length of time is pure folly.

One needs only to look at the stances and behaviors of the Republican constituency to find the folly:

  • a decorated war veteran is called "Hanoi John"
  • a triple-amputee's service to country is trivialized because it "didn't happen during combat"
  • abandoning their own ideologies of smaller government and libertarianism in favor of huge spending and increased tax burdens to the majority
  • inability to admit that they themselves are capable of mistakes
  • ironic lack of faith in fellow christians
  • refusal to fact-check even the largest of statements by their own leader
  • accusations of "despicable" behavior in those who oppose, while using the same behavior in the attack
  • utter lack of long-term vision
  • utter lack of any big-picture view
  • reactive, not proactive

These are people who don't wish for less crime, just for more punishment; who don't want a better life, just a better life than you have; who believe that they will be the Chosen People of the Oligarchs and Plutocrats, once they're installed in all the important places.

These are behaviors that desperately strive for a wallet that's even just one dollar-bill fatter than it was before; behaviors that suggest they have no problem with shitting where they eat, because clean-up is someone else's problem; behaviors that suggest walls on either side and bad guys behind, instead of a bright open vista ahead.

I was going to suggest that the Republican mobs play a Zero Sum Game, but they're not playing a game.

Games have rules.

September 12, 2004

Ummm....Ummm....WOW!

I'm utterly speechless.

A massage from Tomo at Kabuki Hot Springs. The look on Sam's face when I gave him a bass guitar for his birthday. A surprise helicopter ride today! And a bunch of our friends wishing us well for our first anniversary (which is tomorrow).

I made the bass happen. Sam made everything else happen. Holy fuck, it was amazing. I was a little oogy about not knowing what was going to be going on; I guess I'm more "that guy" than I thought. Then I was a little oogy about about-to-be in a helicopter.

It was amazing. The pilot was cute. And awkward. And cutely awkward. But, oddly, not awkwardly-cute. Oh, and awkwardly curious about the mens.

"Hmmph. I guess I'm still not going to get to go under the Golden Gate Bridge," I jokingly said to Sam after I found out it was a helicopter ride and not a boat ride we were going on. I've lived in San Francisco for eleven years and never managed to do that one thing. I've wanted to for a long time; it just never worked out that way.

Well, good thing our awkward cute pilot wanted to show off. As we swung around the City side of the bridge, he said, "They built this bridge so I could have something to play with." Then he leaned the helicopter forward and flew under the bridge. Holy fuck, the movie. Go look. But for full effect, punch yourself in the stomach a few times til you feel oogy first. (Sam took the photo)

Sam is the best boyfriend in the entire world. And the most beautiful.

I love you, baby. Thank you for all this happiness.

September 10, 2004

Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday to the Boy/LOML/TOH. It's been an extraordinary year. You got out of the military, you moved away from Tucson, you moved to San Francisco. And, for GoB's sake, you met ME.

I love you more than I can say, but that won't stop me from saying it over and over and over again. I love you.

Happy Birthday, Baby. I'm the one who got the best gift.

September 09, 2004

Running on a Mistake

A quote from Bill Maher:

And finally, New Rule: You can't run on a mistake. Franklin Roosevelt didn't run for re-election claiming Pearl Harbor was his finest hour. Abe Lincoln was a great president, but the high point of his second term wasn't theater security. 9/11 wasn't a triumph of the human spirit. It was a f***-up by a guy on vacation.

Now, don't get me wrong, Mr. President. I'm not blaming you for 9/11. We have blue-ribbon commissions to do that. And I'm not saying there was anything improper about your immediate response to the attacks. Someone had to stay in that classroom and protect those kids from Chechen rebels.

But by the looks of your convention, you'd think that the worst thing that ever happened to us was the best thing that ever happened to you. You just can't keep celebrating the deadliest attack ever as if it's your personal rendezvous with greatness. You don't see old men who were shot down during World War II jumping out of a plane every year. I mean, other than your dad.

But even your dad didn't run for re-election based on a recession and his propensity to barf on the Japanese. Now, I know you'd like us all to get swept away with emotionalism and stop sweating the small stuff like the deficit and the environment, and focus on what's really important: how you look in a fireman's hat. But crying during your speech? I mean, come on! There's no crying in politics! It's not fair! That's a trick chicks use. How are we supposed to discuss this rationally if you're going to cry?! There's a name for people who exploit their participation in historical events for political gain. They're called the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.

So I say, if you absolutely must win an election on the backs of dead people, do it like they do in Chicago, and have them actually vote for you.


September 07, 2004

Polling

This NY Times column is genius. And I'd still think it was genius if the point spread went to Kerry's favor.

September 03, 2004

All Hat, No Cattle

Borrowing from Zell Miller's logic, President Bush is a liar. He's lying when it comes to health care. There is no other conclusion. He wants smaller government. He also supposedly wants to add clinics to every "poor county" in America, but that costs money, taxpayer money! So, using Zell Miller's "Kerry voted against <pork>military weaponry, vehicles and aircraft</pork>"-style logic, George W. Bush is clearly against healthcare. No wait, he's clearly against government spending. No wait, he has to pay just a little attention to us here on Planet Earth pay lip service to something other than that little bit o' war, right? We still have a flagging economy; we still have suck-ass health care; we still have children being left behind. We still have a stupid-ass war going on to distract us from the absence of WMD's, the absence of bin Laden. George W. Bush's War on Terra. Nice ring to it.

Our botoxed esteemed Governor Schwarzenegger, who was born two years after the last tank rolled through Austria, born in a region that wasn't ever occupied by Soviet anything, wasn't even—and is still not—a Socialist nation, nonetheless tugged on their [place where there should be a] heart strings with his fictive prowess.

Back to Zell, his stuff was just too good. He got steamed up by Kerry and us Evil Liberals calling the Iraq War an "occupation" instead of a liberation. Stupid-ass Democrat contradicting President Bush himself, who has called it an "occupation" over and over—to quote, "No, they're not happy being occupied. I wouldn't be happy if I were occupied, would you?" Those Democrats will stoop to anything, won't they?

I am, however, starting to realize the reason that the stupid crazy bitches of the Right call John Kerry "Hanoi John": he actually went there, unlike Cheney, who got two deferments, unlike Bush, who couldn't find a shred of self-sacrifice with both hands and a flashlight.

By now, I realize it just does no good to criticize Bush, because Republicans don't care who it is, as long as he's got a Big Red "R" on his chest. Better Dead than Red, I say.

These are the same sycophants people whose blind obsequiousness makes them feel OK in making jokes about Bill Clinton's health. How do you reason with that kind of mindset?

They say that in any organized religion, there are two types of clerics: those who use the dogma for personal gain and those who sacrifice themselves for the sake of the greater ethic. To see the RNC all this week, you'd think there was only one kind. Ahh, but this week wasn't about thinking.

Bush's speech may have been "All Hat, No Cattle", but with Zell's flip-flopping, Schwarzenegger's True Lies, Pataki's failed memory (ask Condi Rice), Giuliani's freakish presence-of-mind while WTC towers collapsed around him and McCain's largely ignored reasonableness, it's clear that there's more ecstasy on the RNC floor than you'll ever find in a gay disco.

"Asshats, ALL Cattle", more like it.

Need more corroboration? Time Magazine has Bush ahead by 11 points now. Asshats, indeed.

Where-y Was Mary?

So much for family values. The Cheney's were there, minus a lesbian.

Bush-Cheney just sucks.

September 01, 2004

One Term Sperm!

I may be a latecomer to the game, but I'm enjoying the hell out of reading DeadBrain. I found it by way of searching for republican personalities who may have appeared on the genius show, The Daily Show with Jon Stewart.

I searched for Ann Coulter, that filthy Bush-bimbo, and found this.

Now, pardon my credulousness, but as I read the article, I found it quite easy to buy into, literally. Blaming Martha Stewart for trying to ruin Bush's campaign by staging the whole going-to-prison stunt, blaming Mother Nature for supporting the eco-friendly Demos, that kind of thing.

But if you follow that link, look at the tag line, especially. That's just pure genius.

So fire up your meme spreaders, folks...pass that one around!

One-term Sperm!
One-term Sperm!
One-term Sperm!

Make it stick! <groan>